Login Register
Follow Us

Revamp manufacturing sector to boost GDP

It is a very difficult situation that India is faced with regarding demand. All these years, it was consumer demand which was the engine of growth for the Indian economy. Suddenly, over the past year, we find it is no longer so and, instead, it is government expenditure which is keeping the economy going.

Show comments

Jayshree Sengupta

Jayshree Sengupta

Senior fellow, Observer
Research Foundation

The government does not seem to be in any hurry to solve the deep economic problems confronting the Indian economy. The World Bank has lowered its forecast for India’s GDP growth at 5 percent for FY 2020-21. The government’s Central Statistics Office (CSO) has also lowered the growth forecast for current fiscal year at 5 per cent, the lowest in 11 years. The RBI has also predicted GDP growth at 5 per cent. The government, however, has failed to come up with a concrete action plan to deal with the slowdown.

It is a very difficult situation that India is faced with regarding demand. All these years, it was consumer demand which was the engine of growth for the Indian economy. Suddenly, over the past year, we find it is no longer so and, instead, it is the government expenditure which is keeping the economy going.

Why did consumers, who are by no means committed to austerity, suddenly hold back purchases? Even after hefty discounts during the last festival season, sales did not pick up. It has to do with the fear of what the future holds. When the economy is booming and there is low unemployment, there is a rise in consumer confidence and people are happy to spend on themselves and their families.

The consumer confidence surveys have shown a dip in confidence recently, according to the CMIE, which is why people are not willing to spend. Many have dependent parents and unemployed family members to support. They are worried about after school tuition costs and rising private school fees for their children. People are worried about the high costs of treatment in case of serious illness. People are afraid that if in future, income flows dry up, they will not be able to maintain their living standards and, hence, hold back on buying a new car or washing machine. There is also a lurking fear of inflation because vegetable prices have been soaring recently — food inflation rose to 10 per cent and retail inflation to 5.54 per cent in November.

The other side of the coin is the investors who are holding back on investments because they have already a problem of inventory pileup due to slow sales and if they do not see prospects of demand for their goods rising, they will hold back on expansion of production.

It is low investment, low income and low demand that are dominating the economic scene. People need incomes. If there was high growth in the manufacturing sector, there could have been more people finding jobs in factories. Unfortunately, the sector has been floundering and there was a shrinkage in output (3.8 per cent) in October and November 2019. According to CSO, the manufacturing sector growth will shrink to 2 per cent in FY 2019-20, down from 6.9 per cent in the previous financial year. It clearly indicates that the sector is not the lead sector anymore.

The Make in India initiative did not take off as expected and that is the main reason why the manufacturing sector has remained stagnant. It promised foreign manufacturing units financial incentives, less red tape, intellectual property rights protection and the availability of a young workforce, low wages and a huge domestic market. Many big names like Apple and Xiaomi have increased their production in India and Samsung has the world's largest smartphone plant near New Delhi, even though the parts are made outside India. In 2015, India had the largest volume of announced greenfield investment (‘greenfield investment’ is defined as tangible investments resulting in new or expanded facilities and jobs and include manufacturing) at $60 billion, according to Financial Times data services. In 2018, China got $107 billion and India got $55 billion. FDI into manufacturing has been only $8 billion during the FY 19 till March.

The fall in the flow of FDI to the manufacturing sector from its previous highs could be a reason why the Make in India initiative has not taken off. This is surprising because India’s ranking, according to the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business, has gone up to the 63rd place over the past few years. Why is it that manufacturing did not take off in India to the same extent it did in Vietnam and Bangladesh? A main reason is infrastructure, like roads, power supply and slow reforms in land acquisition and labour laws. Our neighbours also have much lower wages and their productivity is higher. India, once boasted to be the most-favoured FDI destination, is no longer so, what with more political problems coming daily to the fore. It will put off many foreign investors.

Also, the share of manufactures in GDP has remained around 15 per cent against the targeted 25 per cent and India is missing out in being a part of the global value supply chain. The government has started giving cash to the poor in rural areas but that may not lead to any significant rise in demand. It is also a paltry Rs 6,000 a year which may be enough to take care of personal loans. The incomes of the rural population have to rise by the creation of non-farm jobs, but this is not happening. Had the Make in India initiative taken off, there would have been many food processing, jams and pickles making factories as well as light manufacturing units in rural areas, giving employment to both men and women. The various other rural initiatives which were undertaken to increase employment also do not seem to have been very successful. Rural India is marked by stagnant wages and low farmers' incomes. Food inflation may, however, help raise income and demand.

When the economy starts growing faster, people would become more optimistic about their own job security and incomes and would start spending. Manufacturing growth holds the key to achieving higher GDP growth.

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman may give incentives to average consumers by cutting IT rates in the next Budget. It may or may not help. The corporate tax cut has not yet unleashed the ‘animal spirits’ among entrepreneurs. There has not been a great change in investment pattern since the corporate tax cut.

The manufacturing sector should be revamped and productivity of workers should rise through efficient infrastructure. The government’s increase in expenditure on infrastructure will help in a big way. Raising government expenditure at times like this is not unwarranted even though the fiscal deficit target may remain unmet.

Show comments
Show comments

Trending News

Also In This Section


Top News


View All

Scottish Sikh artist Jasleen Kaur shortlisted for prestigious Turner Prize

Jasleen Kaur, in her 30s, has been nominated for her solo exhibition entitled ‘Alter Altar' at Tramway contemporary arts venue in Glasgow

Amritsar: ‘Jallianwala Bagh toll 57 more than recorded’

GNDU team updates 1919 massacre toll to 434 after two-year study

Meet Gopi Thotakura, a pilot set to become 1st Indian to venture into space as tourist

Thotakura was selected as one of the six crew members for the mission, the flight date of which is yet to be announced


Most Read In 24 Hours