Login Register
Follow Us

Once again, locked in a battle

Show comments

Manpriya Singh

he third battle of Panipat; at loggerheads are Maratha warrior Sadashiv Rao Bhau and Afghan king Ahmed Shah Abdali. So far so true! The ‘nth’ battle of modern India; at loggerheads are the makers and Karni Sena, Jats, Rajasthan royals, as the case may be! The bone of contention? Documented past, its depiction, its interpretation and the great Indian debate — mythology versus history.

So when the release of Panipat brought along not just reviews, but news to do with controversy, over the alleged negative portrayal of Maharaja Surajmal of Bharatpur, it was just a new controversy, not a new situation. Says filmmaker Sudarshan Juyal. “People should understand that cinema is a part of popular culture and not a discourse on history, which of course should be taken much more seriously. Cinema itself means creative liberty. Eventually, it’s business with hundreds of crores involved,” This NSD and FTII graduate, who always warns the aspiring filmmakers during workshops on the consequences of dealing with history at present, adds, “History, even off the screen has become controversial now.”

Widespread criticism

Not just certain section of the royals from Rajasthan criticised the film, even politician Vasundhara Raje has objected to the “incorrect portrayal of the noble, self-respecting, highly revered Maharaja Surajmal.” With IFS officer Parveen Kaswan even fact-checking the film, followed by a tweet, “Not only wrong but also ill-informed depiction of Maharaja Surajmal,” followed by his advice to Marathas laid out in detail.

Meanwhile, Rajasthan Minister Vishvendra Singh has called for a ban on the screening of the film, alleging how his ancestor Maharaja Surajmal of Bharatpur was depicted as not helping the Maratha army while they were retreating after the battle. “It is very sad that a great man like Maharaja Surajmal Jat of Bharatpur has been depicted in the film Panipat in a very wrong way, while tampering with historical facts. I believe that the film should be banned in view of the huge opposition by the Jat community of Haryana, Rajasthan and north India, otherwise the law and order of the country may deteriorate.”

Flip side

Calling for a ban is a bit too much. Filmmaker Aditya Datt, director of Commando 3 and several web-series, feels that for dramatic cinema we need to let the filmmakers be. “If it was a documentary they were making, then you expect the facts to be true in the literal sense. But for commercial films, we need the liberty to express.” Shares another filmmaker on condition of anonymity, “There is a reason we put disclaimers at the very beginning.”

manpriya@tribunemail.com

Show comments
Show comments

Trending News

Also In This Section


Top News


View All

40-year-old Delhi man takes 200 flights in 110 days to steal jewellery from co-passengers, would assume dead brother’s identity

2 separate cases of theft were reported on separate flights in the past three months, after which a dedicated team from IGI Airport was formed to nab the culprits

Mother's Day Special: How region’s top cops, IAS officer strike a balance between work and motherhood

Punjab DGP Gurpreet, Himachal DGP Satwant, Chandigarh SSP Kanwardeep, Ferozepur SSP Saumya, IAS officer Amrit Singh open up on the struggles they face

Enduring magic of Surjit Patar: A tribute to Punjab’s beloved poet

A tribute to Punjab’s beloved poet, who passed away aged 79 in Ludhiana


Most Read In 24 Hours