Centre can’t insist on withdrawal of suit by Kerala, says top court

Tribune News Service

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, March 6

Noting it’s a state’s right to approach it under Article 131 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court on Wednesday disapproved of the Centre insisting on withdrawal of a suit filed by the Kerala Government as a pre-condition for giving consent to the state for additional borrowing.

“What we want to suggest to you right now is that you don’t insist on the condition of withdrawal of the suit… You can’t say withdraw the suit. That’s a constitutional right under Article 131,” a Bench led by Justice Surya Kant told Attorney General R Venkataramani and Additional Solicitor General G Venkataraman, who represented the Centre.

The Bench, which also included Justice KV Vishwanathan, however, said the Centre could impose other conditions for improved fiscal management.

Article 131 deals with the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction in a dispute between the Centre and one or more states; or a dispute between two or more states.

Kerala has challenged the Centre’s power to impose conditions on borrowing.

The Bench praised the Indian economy, saying, “The entire world is recognising India as a robust, economically sound country. There is no doubt about it. Even when we go out of the country on judicial platforms, we find this kind of feeling there. And it’s not a feeling based on perception. It’s based on correct facts and figures and the strong pillar on which the economy is thriving…”

Noting that the Centre should be concerned about fiscal mismanagement by states as it impacted the nation’s economy, the top court advised the Centre and the Kerala Government to iron out their differences over a cap on net borrowing by the latter.

The dialogue between the Centre and the state must not stop merely because of the pending suit, the court said while stressing on the need to resolve the issue. “Let all the senior officials who are capable of taking a decision and who are already involved in decision making sit together and resolve this,” it said.

The Bench did not fix any date for further hearing the matter but said the parties were at liberty to mention it whenever they wanted a hearing.

The Kerala Government has accused the Centre of interfering in the exercise of its “exclusive, autonomous and plenary powers” to regulate the state’s finances by imposing a ceiling on borrowing.

It had told the top court on February 19 that a meeting held on February 15 failed to make much headway in resolving the contentious issue.

On behalf of the Kerala government, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said the state was left with no choice but to agitate the issue.

About The Author

Tribune News Service

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.

#Kerala #Supreme Court