Login Register
Follow Us

SC seeks LeT man Tunda’s reply on Delhi Police plea in TADA case

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of jailed Lashkar-e-Toiba bomb expert Abdul Karim Tunda on an appeal of the Delhi Police challenging a lower court order to discharge him in a 1994 TADA case.

Show comments

New Delhi, January 8

The Supreme Court on Friday sought the response of jailed Lashkar-e-Toiba bomb expert Abdul Karim Tunda on an appeal of the Delhi Police challenging a lower court order to discharge him in a 1994 TADA case.

Tunda, 73, whose name had figured in the list of 20 terrorists who India had sought to be handed over after the 26/11 Mumbai attack, was let off on March 10 last year by a lower court in a case lodged under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), the Explosive Substance Act, the Arms Act and under section 120(B) (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC.

A Bench comprising Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy issued notice to Tunda, who is still behind the bars as there are several other cases pending against him.

The police, in its appeal, said the confession of an accused before a police officer under the TADA, which is now repealed, is treated as substantive evidence and the trial court committed error in discharging Tunda at the initial stage.

The police have heavily relied on a psycho-profiling test that was conducted on Tunda after his arrest by Special Cell of Delhi Police on August 16 2013 from the Indo-Nepal border.

The Special Cell had filed a chargesheet against Tunda in the case in which five accused were arrested on January 17, 1994, and 150 kg explosives and six daggers were allegedly recovered from their possession.

The trial court in its judgement in December 1999 had convicted the five accused—Abdul Haq, Aftab, Abdul Wahid, Afaq and Afran Ahmad—under the provisions of Explosive Substance Act read with section 120(B) of the IPC.

In its supplementary charge sheet against Tunda, the police had said he was declared a proclaimed offender and was involved in various terror cases in India.

Tunda had argued that there was no evidence in the case and confessional statements of the arrested co-accused cannot be relied upon against him. — PTI

Show comments
Show comments

Top News

Most Read In 24 Hours