Login Register
Follow Us

Allow freedom of expression by journalists: SC to politician’s daughter

NEW DELHI: Maintaining that journalists should be allowed to exercise freedom of expression, the Supreme Court on Monday said a particular piece of wrong reporting should not be held against them forever.

Show comments

Satya Prakash

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, January 8

Maintaining that journalists should be allowed to exercise freedom of expression, the Supreme Court on Monday said a particular piece of wrong reporting should not be held against them forever.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

“You must allow freedom of expression…There may be some kind of wrong reporting… But don’t hold on to it forever,” a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra said dismissing a special leave petition filed by a Bihar politician’s daughter to revive a criminal defamation case against senior journalists Rajdeep Sardesai, Raghav Bahl and others.

Rahmat Fatima Amanullah – daughter of former Bihar minister Parveen Amanullah – had challenged the Patna High Court’s order quashing criminal defamation proceedings initiated by her against Sardesai and Bahl for allegedly defaming her by telecasting certain reports on Hindi news channel IBN 7 in 2011 regarding her alleged involvement in a land allotment scam in the state. Her father Afzal Amanullah is a former bureaucrat.

Rahmat Fatima Amanullah was allotted a piece of land to set up a factory at Bihiya in Bhojpur district of Bihar in 2010 allegedly in violation of norms and the TV channel had telecast certain reports on it.

Following the telecast, she had filed a criminal defamation case against Sardesai – who was Editor-in-Chief cum Chief Executive Officer of IBN Network and Bahl, who was Founding/Controlling Shareholder & Managing Director of Network 18 that telecast the news.

But by its September 12, 2017 order, the High Court quashed the October 29, 2011 order of a First Class Judicial Magistrate in Patna who had summoned Sardesai and Behl after holding that there was a “prima facie case” against them for the offences of defamation and criminal conspiracy under Section 500 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. 

It was this order of the High Court which was challenged by Rahmat Fatima Amanullah before the Supreme Court.

Contending that the news story done by the TV channel on the said land allocation was wrong, she wanted the top court to revive her defamation case against the journalists.

Show comments
Show comments

Top News

View All

Scottish Sikh artist Jasleen Kaur shortlisted for prestigious Turner Prize

Jasleen Kaur, in her 30s, has been nominated for her solo exhibition entitled ‘Alter Altar' at Tramway contemporary arts venue in Glasgow

Amritsar: ‘Jallianwala Bagh toll 57 more than recorded’

GNDU team updates 1919 massacre toll to 434 after two-year study

Meet Gopi Thotakura, a pilot set to become 1st Indian to venture into space as tourist

Thotakura was selected as one of the six crew members for the mission, the flight date of which is yet to be announced

Most Read In 24 Hours