Login Register
Follow Us

Maruti unrest: SC sets aside order to recall witnesses

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court order allowing the accused to recall and re-examine several prosecution witnesses in the case in which a senior manager was allegedly burnt alive and many others were injured in the 2012 labour unrest at Manesar plant of Maruti Suzuki Limited.

Show comments

New Delhi, August 24

The Supreme Court today set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court order allowing the accused to recall and re-examine several prosecution witnesses in the case in which a senior manager was allegedly burnt alive and many others were injured in the 2012 labour unrest at Manesar plant of Maruti Suzuki Limited.

“We allow the appeals (filed by Haryana Government and others), set aside the order passed by the High Court and restore that of the trial judge. We direct the learned trial judge to proceed with the trial in accordance with the law,” a bench of Justices Dipak Misra and UU Lalit said.

Avnish Dev, 51, General Manager, Human Resources of the company was allegedly burnt alive and nearly 100 others were injured on the evening of July 18, 2012, when agitating workers went on a rampage, attacking officials and torching the office.

The Haryana Government had filed an appeal in the apex court against the Hugh Court order annulling the order of the trial judge.

The trial court had rejected the plea of some accused seeking to recall and re-examine some key witnesses on the grounds including that their main counsel was unwell.

“The HC has been moved by the ground that the accused are in the custody and the concept of speedy trial is not nullified and no prejudice is caused and therefore, the principle of magnanimity should apply. Suffice it to say, a criminal trial does not singularly centre around the accused.

“In it, there is involvement of the prosecution, the victim and the victim represents the collective. The cry of the collective may not be uttered in decibels which are physically audible in the court premises, but the court has to remain sensitive to such silent cries and the agonies, for the society seek justice. Therefore, a balance has to be struck,” the apex court said. It also said that “magnanimous approach” should not be confined to the accused only.

“Regard being had to the concept of balance and weighing the factual score on the scale of balance, we are of the convinced opinion that the HC has fallen into absolute error in axing the order passed by the learned trial judge,” Justice Misra, writing the judgement, said. — PTI

Show comments
Show comments

Top News

View All

Scottish Sikh artist Jasleen Kaur shortlisted for prestigious Turner Prize

Jasleen Kaur, in her 30s, has been nominated for her solo exhibition entitled ‘Alter Altar' at Tramway contemporary arts venue in Glasgow

Amritsar: ‘Jallianwala Bagh toll 57 more than recorded’

GNDU team updates 1919 massacre toll to 434 after two-year study

Meet Gopi Thotakura, a pilot set to become 1st Indian to venture into space as tourist

Thotakura was selected as one of the six crew members for the mission, the flight date of which is yet to be announced

Most Read In 24 Hours