Jio opposes bailout to telcos

New Delhi, October 31

Reliance Jio today strongly opposed any bailout to telecom companies at taxpayer's expense, and asserted that telcos should be mandated to deposit their dues within the court-stipulated timeline of three months, as they have the capacity to comfortably clear their liabilities.

In a letter to Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Thursday, Jio argued that even an unlikely event of failure of two operators will not have an adverse impact on the sector dynamics given the "existence of vibrant competition, including presence of the PSUs" as well as the absence of any restriction on entry of new operators.

Jio said it did not agree with COAI's alarmist views that telecom sector will collapse in the absence of immediate relief by the government.

It also lambasted industry body COAI for writing to government "under the influence of two of its members in furtherance of their vested interests" and accused the association of acting as a "mouthpiece of two service providers" and harbouring a negative bias towards Jio.

Launching a full-fledged attack on Cellular Operators' Association of India (COAI) for writing ex-parte to the government on the financial distress in the sector, Jio said the body was "blackmailing" to "extract relief from the government" after all legal recourse had expired.

"We submit that the so-called affected service providers have sufficient financial capacity to pay the government dues by monetising their existing assets/investments and by issuing fresh equity in their companies," it wrote in the letter to Prasad.

Jio said it "strongly disagrees with COAI submission that in absence of immediate relief by the government the telecom sector will collapse and there would be unprecedented crisis in the sector as two of the three private operators will be facing extreme financial crisis." "We submit that COAI has used threatening and blackmailing tone with the government by referring to possible job loss, quality of service loss and loss of investment in the sector and its contentions border on contempt of Supreme Court judgment, especially when the Supreme Court has prescribed three months' time to deposit the due amount," it said. — PTI