Login Register
Follow Us

Man approaches PMO against JIT

JALANDHAR: Vinod Sood, a resident of Model Gram, Ludhiana, who is also the owner of plot no. 279-D at Surya Enclave Extension, a scheme launched by the Jalandhar Improvement Trust (JIT) in 2011, has said despite making several requests and visits to JIT officials, he has neither received possession of his plot nor got any refund.

Show comments

Avneet Kaur

Jalandhar, December 6

Vinod Sood, a resident of Model Gram, Ludhiana, who is also the owner of plot no. 279-D at Surya Enclave Extension, a scheme launched by the Jalandhar Improvement Trust (JIT) in 2011, has said despite making several requests and visits to JIT officials, he has neither received possession of his plot nor got any refund.

Now, he has complained to the Prime Minister through an online complaint portal, Centralised Public Grievance Redressal and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS).

In his complaint, Sood, a retired bank manager, has written that in 2011, during the SAD-BJP government in Punjab, the JIT launched a housing project known as ‘94.97 acre Surya Enclave Extension Scheme’. He said it had offered around 431 plots ranging from 100 sq yards to 500 sq yards to the general public at a reserve price of Rs17,000 per sq yard.

Sood said he had booked a 200-sq yard plot in the name of his wife Mintu Sood and they were allotted plot no. 279-D at Surya Enclave Extension in November 2011.

He said he paid the complete amount of Rs39, 65,000 for the plot to the JIT by 2014, but not received possession till date.

In his complaint, he demanded that the Union Government should intervene in the matter and conduct a high-level inquiry. He said at present, the JIT is reeling under a financial debt and a number of allottees had registered cases with the state and district consumer forums against the Trust for duping them and not fulfilling the promises of giving possession.

Sood said he had also filed a complaint against the JIT with the state consumer forum and had won the case against the Trust in 2017, but it further challenged the orders in the National Consumer Forum.

“Now, I completely feel helpless as there is no response or any action being taken against the JIT. Therefore, I approached Prime Minister’s office to seek justice,” he said.

Meanwhile, in a reply to the complaint, the Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances has fixed the responsibility of Vini Mahajan, Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Government of Punjab, to look into the matter and serve a suitable reply to the complainant’s complain.

Show comments
Show comments

Top News

View All

Amritsar: ‘Jallianwala Bagh toll 57 more than recorded’

GNDU team updates 1919 massacre toll to 434 after two-year study

Meet Gopi Thotakura, a pilot set to become 1st Indian to venture into space as tourist

Thotakura was selected as one of the six crew members for the mission, the flight date of which is yet to be announced

Diljit Dosanjh’s alleged wife slams social media for misuse of her identity amid speculations

He is yet to respond to the recent claims about his wife

India cricketer Hardik Pandya duped of Rs 4.3 crore, stepbrother Vaibhav in police net for forgery

According to reports, Vaibhav is accused of diverting money from a partnership firm, leading to financial loss for Hardik and Krunal Pandya

Most Read In 24 Hours